Charles Darwin, (pictured - left - as a young man), whom many people consider to have been the originator of Evolutionary Theory
as applicable both to animal life generally and to Humanity in particular, actually shares with Alfred Russel Wallace the attribution for
independent development of Modern Evolutionary Theory. Neither of them were to be the first
to go so far as to explicitly take the step of subjecting Mankind to Evolutionary Theory speculations.
Darwin, born in 1809 into quite a comfortable background as the son of a well-regarded
and prosperous doctor based in
Shrewsbury, England, was an avid beetle collector in his teenage-years who abandoned medical studies after being appalled by the sufferings of
patients undergoing the surgical techniques of the day, (without relief from anaesthetics), and then entered
Christ's College, Cambridge, with the view of becoming a country parson. In those times it was quite accepted for clergymen to
interest themselves in Natural History as part of God's creation.
Whilst at Cambridge his interest in Natural History led to informal
contacts with professors of Botany and Geology and, through these contacts, to an invitation to join HMS Beagle on an exploratory voyage to
South America and beyond as a geologist.
This invitation arrived just as Darwin had completed his university degree course and
effectively postponed his actually becoming ordained as a clergyman.
During this voyaging on HMS Beagle (1831-1836), however, Darwin lost his faith and also emerged from it as a recognised man of science due to the
wider publication of certain learned papers he had sent home to friends and acquaintances. The Beagle voyage gave Darwin a wide background
in Natural History.
As early as July 1837 Darwin opened a notebook to record his thoughts on "that mystery of mysteries - the origin of species" as this entry from
In July I opened my first note-book for facts in relation to the Origin of Species, about which I had long reflected, and never
ceased working on it for the next twenty years.
The direction of the development of Darwin's thoughts can perhaps be illustrated by this famous
Tree of Life sketch from his Notebook B dating from 1837-8:-
Charles Darwin's early evolutionary theory insight of how a branching tree-like genus of related species might
originate by divergence from a starting point (1) to effectively establish related species at such notional points as A, B, C and D.
There is an accompanying text annotation that reads:-
Case must be that one generation then should be as many living as now. To do this & to have many
species in same genus (as is) requires extinction.
Thus between A & B immense gap of relation. C & B the finest gradation, B & D rather greater
distinction. Thus genera would be formed. - bearing relation (page 36 ends - page 37 begins)
to ancient types with several extinct forms.
From Darwin's notebook B now stored in Cambridge University library.
Darwin had grown up in and, despite his own skepticism after returning from his voyages, continued to live in a society that generally accepted
explanations of creation whereby the Earth and all of its unchanging, immutable, life forms - including Human Beings - were, as they were and
as they ever had been, as a result of Original Acts of Divine Creation.
Against this pervasive cultural background, in a confidential letter of 11 January
1844 to a fellow scientist named Joseph Hooker, Darwin wrote that:-
I have been now ever since my return engaged in a very presumptuous work & which I know no one individual who wd not say a very
foolish one. - I was so struck with distribution of Galapagos organisms &c &c & with the character of the American fossil mammifers,
&c &c that I determined to collect blindly every sort of fact, which cd bear any way on what are species. - I have read heaps of agricultural
& horticultural books, & have never ceased collecting facts - At last gleams of light have come, & I am almost convinced (quite contrary to
opinion I started with) that species are not (it is like confessing a murder) immutable. Heaven forfend me from Lamarck nonsense of a
"tendency to progression" "adaptations from the slow willing of animals" &c, - but the conclusions I am led to are not widely different
from his - though the means of change are wholly so - I think I have found out (here's presumption!) the simple way by which species
become exquisitely adapted to various ends. - You will now groan, & think to yourself 'on what a man have I been wasting my
time in writing to.' - I shd, five years ago, have thought so. -
A professional collector of biological specimens named Alfred Russel Wallace, (pictured right), was acquainted with Charles Darwin and
had forwarded specimens he had collected to Darwin. Darwin was a great writer of
letters and had corresponded intermittently with Wallace.
(Lamarck's approach effectively held that species needed or wanted to achieve swifter gaits, or stronger muscles, or whatever, to gain
food and such adaptations followed on from those needs or wants.
Darwin's approach ultimately held that slight physical variations occur within
species and that such variations, particulaly those that promote more effective winning of food for survival, allow those individuals that happen
to possess them more success in terms of survival and hence breeding opportunity - passing favourable variations or modifications on to their
And so it was that Wallace, who had independently arrived at an evolutionary theory in 1858 whilst he was laid up with a malarial fever at Ternate,
Celebes Islands where he had been collecting biological specimens, sent a twenty page long memoir about this
evolutionary theory he had devised to the influential expert
amateur naturalist Charles Darwin, which arrived at Darwin's house in Kent in June 1858.
In a covering letter Wallace asked that Darwin forward the memoir to a famous scientist named Sir Charles Lyell,
if Darwin thought the content merited Lyell's attention.
Wallace had concluded that species throw up occasional variations in form which may decisively benefit the individuals who
carry that variation. He, like Darwin years earlier, had been struck by a viewpoint attributable to Thomas Malthus, which held
that populations will tend to outstrip the food supply naturally available to them. Again, like Darwin, Wallace envisaged a
relentless favouring in terms of short term survival and longer term breeding opportunities being naturally bestowed on those individuals that
bore variant traits that favoured the winning of scarce food for their day-to-day sustenance.
Darwin subsequently sent Wallace's manuscript to Lyell; with his own covering letter of
18th June 1858 that included the following sentences:-
My dear Lyell,
Although Darwin had shown himself reluctant to publish his theorising in the past he was now faced with the possibility that his
own labours and insights might be overshadowed with much of any associated credit being won by Alfred Russel Wallace upon the
publication of his sketch in some scientific journal or other - how was he now to act - he would doubtless have felt it strictly necessary
to behave in a gentlemanly fashion and, as such, would have been conscious of the necessity of giving Wallace due
Some year or so ago, you recommended me to read a paper by Wallace in the Annals, which had interested
you & as I was writing to him, I knew this would please him much, so I told him. He has to day sent me
the enclosed & asked me to forward it to you. It seems to me well worth reading. Your words have come
true with a vengeance that I shd. be forestalled. You said this when I explained to you here very
briefly my views of "Natural Selection" depending on the Struggle for existence. - I never saw a more striking coincidence. If Wallace
had my manuscript sketch written out in 1842 he could not have
made a better short abstract! Even his terms now stand as Heads of my Chapters.
Please return me the manuscript which he does not say he wishes me to publish; but I shall of course at once write
& offer to send to any Journal. So all my originality, whatever it may amount to, will be smashed. Though my Book,
if it will ever have any value, will not be deteriorated; as all the labour consists in the application of the theory.
I hope you will approve of Wallace's sketch, that I may tell him what you say.
Several days later Darwin again wrote to Sir Charles Lyell:-
As I had not intended to publish my sketch, can I do so honourably, because Wallace has sent me an outline of
his doctrine? I would far rather burn my whole book than that he or any other man should think that I
behaved in a paltry spirit. Do you not think that that his having sent me this
sketch ties my hands? I do not in least believe that that he originated his views from anything
which I wrote to him.
Sir Charles Lyell was actually one of Darwin's personal friends and knew that Darwin had
long been working in the same area of study. In the event Lyell and other scientific friends of Darwin's agreed
a compromise where both Darwin and Wallace would be enabled to share in the release of the Theory of Evolution for public consideration
and thus put both of them on academic record as being responsible for its development.
Neither Wallace nor Charles Darwin were present at the
meeting of the Linnaean Society in July 1858 when papers
attributable to each were brought to the attention of the wider
Following on from Wallace's approach of 1858 Darwin made
efforts to draw his notes together into a work intended for
publication. That work was prepared and published under the title
Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life was first published on 24 November 1859.
There were only
1,250 copies prepared in this first edition, and Darwin had suggested to his publisher that even this would
be too many for what he presumed to be a limited and specialised scientific market.
Although the book was priced at fourteen shillings - more than a week's wages for a labouring man and hence
beyond most persons convenient means -
and its content was slightly technical this edition sold out to the book trade on the day of publication.
A second edition of 3,000 copies was issued some two months later.
Few books have had such a profound and far-reaching impact on Human Society across the world.
In this work Darwin concentrated on "Descent with modification" as having been extremely influential in giving rise
to new species of animal life generally and
with no particular focus on Humanity. Darwin work suggested that there had been an initial creation but with many subsequent evolutionary
over vast periods of time. Perhaps the most explicit mention of humans as being themselves subject to evolutionary processes occurs in this passage from one of the
closing paragraphs of Origin of Species.
"The whole history of the world, as at present
known, although of a length quite incomprehensible by us, will
hereafter be recognised as a mere fragment of time, compared with the
ages which have elapsed since the first creature, the progenitor of
innumerable extinct and living descendants, was created.
The publication of Darwin's evolutionary theory, as set out in the Origin of Species, was
followed by intense public debate where fully Creationist Faith went head to head with Science's newly proposed Evolution Theory.
In the distant future I see open fields for far more important
researches. Psychology will be based on a new foundation, that of the
necessary acquirement of each mental power and capacity by gradation.
Light will be thrown on the origin of man and his history.
Authors of the highest eminence seem to be fully satisfied with the
view that each species has been independently created. To my mind it
accords better with what we know of the laws impressed on matter by the
Creator, that the production and extinction of the past and present
inhabitants of the world should have been due to secondary causes, like
those determining the birth and death of the individual. When I view
all beings not as special creations, but as the lineal descendants of
some few beings which lived long before the first bed of the Silurian system was deposited, they seem to me to
Gradually mankind became the explicit focus of evolutionary theory speculation.
Sir Charles Lyell's The Antiquity of Man was published in early February 1863 and detailed the discoveries of traces of early man dating from
the palaeolithic era.
In this work which sold well and, "shattered the tacit agreement that mankind should be the sole preserve of theologians and historians". In this
avoided any definitive statement on human evolution.
Later that year a work entitled Evidence as to Man's Place in Nature by Thomas Henry Huxley was the first book devoted to the topic
of human evolution, and
discussed much of the anatomical and other evidence for the evolution of man and apes
from a common ancestor.
Something of the nature and direction of Huxley's work can prehaps be gauged from the fact that its three chapters were entitled:-
On the Natural History of the Man-Like Apes
On the Relations of Man to the Lower Animals
On Some Fossil Remains of Man
Based on anatomical and other evidence for evolution the book, which achieved a wide readership, put the case that evolutionary theory
applied as fully to human beings as to all other life.
It was in 1871 that Darwin's first explicit work on Human Evolutionary theory was published. In this work, Descent of Man, Darwin attempted
to persuade the reader of mankind's
Darwin started his Chapter I of this work, itself entitled "The evidence of the descent of man from some lower form"
with the sentence "It is notorious that man is constructed on the same general type or model as other mammals..."
In our own times evolutionary theory is widely applied both to primates and to Human Beings.
Source : The National Museum of Natural History - Washington, D.C.
Aldous Huxley &
Interestingly, Aldous Huxley, a grandson to Thomas Henry Huxley, today enjoys a certain celebrity as an exponent
of the view that the major World Religions, importantly, share common ground in terms of their inner-most spiritual teachings.
The Perennial Philosophy
Aldous Huxley was not the first person to detect such a 'Perennial Philosophy' of shared common ground.
Some idea of what this term means can perhaps be gained from reading the excerpt from an introduction,
written in 1944 by Aldous Huxley, to an English translation of the Bhagavad-Gita, a principal Vedic (or Hindu) holy book,
that had been co-authored by one of his friends.
More than twenty-five centuries have passed since that which has been called the Perennial Philosophy was first committed to writing;
and in the course of those centuries it has found expression, now partial, now complete, now in this form, now in that, again and again...
...the Perennial Philosophy has spoken almost all the languages of Asia and Europe and has made use of the terminology and traditions of every one of the higher religions. But under all this confusion of tongues and myths, of local histories and particularist doctrines, there remains a Highest Common Factor, which is the Perennial Philosophy in what may be called its chemically pure state...
The Wisdoms and Insights available on our
site include some about Human Existence itself:-
Surely even non-religious persons would take a positive view about
the probability that "Human Be-ing" is more truly metaphysical than physical!
This famous caricature from an edition of 'The Hornet' in 1871 appeared as wider society was attempting to come to terms with Darwin's then recently
published "The Descent of Man" :-
If Charles Darwin were alive today we at Age-of-the-Sage would be urgently seeking to interest him
in our discovery of the fact that there is close agreement between several major World Faiths, Plato,
Socrates, Pythagoras and Shakespeare ~ and Psychological Science ~ in suggesting that Human Wisdom / Spirituality is relative to
Human Desire / Materialism and to Human Wrath / Ethnicity.